Connexion
Dernières nouvelles
Applying the Jordan framework: Are courts placing too much of the burden on the defence?
In R v. Jordan, the Supreme Court put a hard cap on the duration of criminal trials — sending a thrill of panic through the justice system in the process. The ruling is roughly two and a half years old now. Time for the training wheels to come off.Now, that backlog of pre-Jordan charges has been largely cleared — the transitional period is over. But Crown and defence lawyers alike report that trial times aren’t speeding up; statistics cited in a recent Law Times article show that in the Ontario Court of Justice, average times to disposition and the number of court appearances have not diminished since Jordan. If the SCC intended the ruling as a salutary shock to the system, it didn’t work.So what happens now?
[ ...Suite ]Date de parution : 2018-12-18
RCMP’s forensic firearm testing backlog adding delays to justice system
The RCMP’s forensics labs are taking nearly four times longer to analyze firearms than they did just four years ago, adding delays to a criminal justice system under pressure to speed up after a recent Supreme Court decision.
[ ...Suite ]Date de parution : 2018-12-16
Court delays persist, despite Jordan
The Supreme Court of Canada decision in Jordanand the problems it tried to address are still top of mind in the criminal courts in Ontario nearly two-and-a-half years after it was released.
[ ...Suite ]Date de parution : 2018-12-03
The performance pay saga reaches a settlement
The issue is the prorating of performance pay in relation to pre-promotion period for the year in which lawyers are promoted. If a lawyer was eligible for performance pay and was promoted during the year, the Employer, rather than pay out a prorated performance pay for the period pre-promotion, paid out nothing at all regardless of your performance rating for the year. The AJC originally filed a grievance in 2011 and in response to that grievance, TB had conceded in the context of the adjudication hearing that pre-promotion service should be recognized. Unfortunately, the adjudicator originally disregarded TB's concession in his decision of 2015, requiring the AJC to file an application for judicial review, which eventually resulted on December 22, 2016 in a remedy limited to the right to pre-promotion performance pay for the year 2010-2011. Thus, the AJC filed another policy grievance on July 27th 2016. The hearing was scheduled for October 2018. We are pleased to announce that we now have a signed Memorandum of Settlement on this matter with TB.
[ ...Suite ]Date de parution : 2018-10-30
Not all Questions are Good Questions: Avoiding Discriminatory Interview Practices
Much ink has been spilled over a recent decision by the Commission de la fonction publique (the "Commission") on the topic of discriminatory interview practices. In Association des procureurs aux poursuites criminelles et pénales et Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales[1], the Commission found that the plaintiff had been discriminated against when she was denied a position due to her pregnancy.
[ ...Suite ]Date de parution : 2018-10-11
Federal government facing pushback over bill to transform justice system
One thing that both the prosecution and the defence seem to agree on is that the federal government’s push to cut preliminary inquiries in most criminal cases will not solve the long-standing problem of delays in the criminal justice system.
[ ...Suite ]Date de parution : 2018-10-01
<-- Retour au nouvelles archivées
Loi spéciale: une entente ou moins d'argent pour les juristes
26-02-2017
Déposée lundi soir, la loi spéciale de Pierre Moreau force le retour au travail des quelque 1100 avocats et notaires de l'État québécois dès mercredi matin. (LE SOLEIL, JEAN-MARIE VILLENUVE)
Déposée lundi soir, la loi force le retour au travail des quelque 1100 avocats et notaires de l'État québécois dès mercredi matin.
Il est question de continuer «avec diligence et bonne foi» les pourparlers pendant une période de 45 jours. Si des désaccords persistent, ils seront soumis à un médiateur nommé par le ministère du Travail. Celui-ci aurait un autre mois pour tenter de rapprocher les parties, mais ne se pencherait pas sur la question de l'indépendance des juristes.
À première vue, à défaut d'entente, Québec imposera alors une augmentation salariale passablement moindre que celle prévue à ses dernières offres. La hausse de 2,1% attendue pour 2019-2020 semble complètement disparue. L'entente imposée serait donc de 7,05% sur cinq ans. L'ensemble des fonctionnaires du front commun ont obtenu 9,15% sur 5 ans lors des négociations de 2015.
Il n'a pas encore été possible de corroborer cette analyse auprès des sources officielles, lundi soir.
Lundi, autant le président du Conseil du Trésor que le premier ministre Philippe Couillard ont expliqué les raisons pour lesquelles ils jugent que les juristes n'ont pas le même statut que les procureurs. Ils se disent toutefois ouverts à en discuter.
Les avocats et juristes de l'État québécois sont en grève depuis le 26 octobre.
