Détails de la nouvelle


Mot de passe oublié?

Dernières nouvelles

Shoplifting and other petty-crime cases are being dropped by courts
Shoplifting and other petty-crime cases are being dropped by courts

Across Canada, people accused of petty crimes like shoplifting, minor assault and fraud are walking free — because the justice system doesn't have time to deal with their cases, as it struggles to move more serious crimes through the courts.

[ ...Suite ]
Date de parution : 2019-05-30
Labour union blasts CAQ government during Bill 21 hearings
Labour union blasts CAQ government during Bill 21 hearings

The CSN, which represents 300,000 workers, backtracked on its traditional position in favour of a ban on symbols for persons in authority.

[ ...Suite ]
Date de parution : 2019-05-15
Federal unions approve agreement on Phoenix damages

Late last week, a subcommittee of federal public service unions and employer representatives reached a tentative agreement to provide damages to public service workers in light of the ongoing Phoenix payroll debacle. This tentative agreement was two years in the making. Today, the undersigned unions are pleased to announce they have signed on to this deal.

[ ...Suite ]
Date de parution : 2019-05-08
Government of Canada and public service unions announce compensation for federal employees impacted

Canada's public servants deserve to be paid properly for their important work and the Government of Canada continues to take action on all fronts to resolve Phoenix pay issues.

[ ...Suite ]
Date de parution : 2019-05-03
PSAC rejects compensation offer for Phoenix pay fiasco, other groups accept
PSAC rejects compensation offer for Phoenix pay fiasco, other groups accept

The federal government says it has reached a tentative deal with some groups on compensation for workers affected by problems with the Phoenix pay system. But the Public Service Alliance of Canada, which represents the majority of federal employees, has rejected the offer.

[ ...Suite ]
Date de parution : 2019-05-03
Applying the Jordan framework: Are courts placing too much of the burden on the defence?
Applying the Jordan framework: Are courts placing too much of the burden on the defence?

In R v. Jordan, the Supreme Court put a hard cap on the duration of criminal trials — sending a thrill of panic through the justice system in the process. The ruling is roughly two and a half years old now. Time for the training wheels to come off.Now, that backlog of pre-Jordan charges has been largely cleared — the transitional period is over. But Crown and defence lawyers alike report that trial times aren’t speeding up; statistics cited in a recent Law Times article show that in the Ontario Court of Justice, average times to disposition and the number of court appearances have not diminished since Jordan. If the SCC intended the ruling as a salutary shock to the system, it didn’t work.So what happens now?​

[ ...Suite ]
Date de parution : 2018-12-18

<-- Retour au nouvelles archivées

Labour union blasts CAQ government during Bill 21 hearings


A group of protesters, including lawyers and teachers, against Bill 21 formed a human chain in downtown Montreal, Quebec May 5, 2019. CHRISTINNE MUSCHI / MONTREAL GAZETTE


QUEBEC — One of the province’s largest labour unions did an about face Wednesday, saying Bill 21 condones prejudices and could lead to the ghettoization of Muslim women because they will not be allowed to work in certain government jobs.


In a stinging rebuke to the government on the second-to-last day of hearings into the proposed legislation, the Confédération des syndicats nationaux (CSN), which represents 300,000 workers including hundreds in the public sector, backtracked on its traditional position in favour of a ban on symbols for persons in authority.


The union now thinks a ban is a bad idea and will do nothing to make the government more secular.


In fact, the union testified, the government is playing a dangerous game that is already backfiring on the streets and on buses in the form of increased anti-immigrant behaviour and incidents.


“In worrying about religious symbols as does the bill, we are condoning prejudices against people who wear symbols and sowing doubt on their capacity (to work) in a professional manner, with neutrality, with integrity and ethics and not proselytizing,” CSN counsellor Marie-Hélène Bonin told the committee.


“One of the dangers we see is the ghettoization of certain communities or certain women who are sent back home,” added her union colleague Mireille Bénard. “Women who we see integrate and emancipate themselves might have to stay at home. What is really worrisome is the ghettoization of certain communities.”


“I hope the minister (Simon Jolin-Barrette) has been attentive to what you are saying,” responded the Québec solidaire MNA on the committee, Sol Zanetti, who sparked the comments with his blunt questions to the union.


It is shift for the union which, in the 2013 debate on the Parti Québécois’s defunct Charter of Quebec Values, took a stand in favour of the Bouchard-Taylor formula that would have slapped a ban on persons in authority such as judges, police officers and prison guards.


At the time, the CSN also argued in favour of expanding the ban to daycare workers and teachers.


But union president Jacques Létourneau told the committee times are changing and the new younger union membership does not see things the same way as the old generation. Immigrants and symbols are in their daily lives.


He also told the committee the bill unfairly targets Muslim women creating “a phenomena of discrimination” against them, while a Muslim man who has a beard for reasons of faith is not targeted because it is simply seen as a “hipster” symbol.


But the union warned of the long-term consequences of Bill 21.


In one paragraph of its brief, the union says “Introducing additional measures that discriminate against entry to the workplace will have the effect of creating a social fracture and resentment in thus marginalized communities for decades to come.”


The testimony comes as the committee winds down from two weeks of hearings. Thursday is the last day.


And while the association representing the province’s provincial police officers endorsed the bill the same as Montreal’s police fraternity has, lawyers and notaries working for the government poked holes in the bill.


They told the committee examining Bill 21 that the rules against religious symbols have to cover all of them or none. It’s a question of coherence.


Describing the issue of symbols as “marginal” among the hundreds of lawyers in the employ of the Quebec government, Marc Dion, president of Les avocats et notaires de l’État Québécois, said of his 1,267 members, between 600 and 700 are covered by the ban in the bill, 500 are not.


That means applying the bill presents special challenges for the judiciary, he added.


There could be situations in a courtroom where a lawyer working for the Régie du logement or the Quebec Human Rights Commission would not be allowed to wear a symbol, but a lawyer working for Revenue Quebec, l’Autorité des marchés financiers or Investissement Québec on the same case can.


And what happens when lawyers are called in to help a cabinet minister at a legislature committee? The lawyer from the finance department is barred from wearing a symbol, the one from revenue is not?


“We are all lawyers, there are just different fields of expertise,” Dion told the committee. “For us, it’s all or none. It’s a question of coherence.


Dion said in his view when a lawyer represents the state they have to be “impartial and neutral,” and appearances matter.


“What happens when someone who finds themselves refused an immigration certificate and sees that the lawyer who is representing the state … is of another faith?  Objectively, certain people might say ‘he was against me because he does not have the same faith.’ ”


The committee also heard Wednesday from the Mouvement laïque Québécois, a civilian lobby group pushing for secularism. The group asked for the ban to be expanded.