News details

Connection







Lost password?

Latest news

Another victory for state lawyers in the Court of Appeal
Another victory for state lawyers in the Court of Appeal

The union of lawyers and notaries of the State has just won another victory, while the Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the Superior Court which had invalidated the special law forcing their return to work, at the end of a long strike in 2017. Les avocats et notaires de l'État québécois (LANEQ) had walked out for four months, in 2016 and 2017, as part of a difficult negotiation to renew their collective agreement with the Quebec government.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2021-04-08
COVID-compliant courts aim to clear backlog of jury trials

Canada’s wheels of justice have slowed down during the pandemic, as court cases and the legal system reckon with COVID-19 concerns. As Ross Lord reports, jury trials are trying to stage a comeback while adjusting to a new reality.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2021-04-04
Crown attorneys to challenge letters of reprimand over October walkout
Crown attorneys to challenge letters of reprimand over October walkout

Sixty-one Nova Scotia Crown attorneys who walked off the job in October to protest legislation revoking their right to binding arbitration are challenging the discipline against them. Each Crown received a letter in April from Laura Lee Langley, Nova Scotia's public service commissioner, that will go into each of their personnel folders. The Crowns are seeking a judicial review of the discipline.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-07-09
Ottawa to allow federal bureaucrats to work from home if possible to prevent coronavirus spread
Ottawa to allow federal bureaucrats to work from home if possible to prevent coronavirus spread

The roughly 300,000 federal employees will be told to stay away from their offices throughout the country as long as their job allows it.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-03-13
Prosecutors Insulted by Government Salary Offer
Prosecutors Insulted by Government Salary Offer

Quebec crown prosecutors find the rejection of an independent report on their remuneration incomprehensible…

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-02-20
Supreme Court decision could help former N.S. Crown lawyer sue Premier, ex-justice minister for libe
Supreme Court decision could help former N.S. Crown lawyer sue Premier, ex-justice minister for libe

A Supreme Court of Canada decision could affect whether government lawyers can use confidential documents to defend their reputations if political bosses “throw them under the bus,” a law professor says.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-02-19


<-- Back to archived news

Why hiring more judges won’t necessarily speed up the justice system

09-03-2018

 

 

Osgoode Hall law professor Alan Young would like to see more disputes being resolved through negotiations and mediation, and the decriminalizing of minor offences to free up court resources.  (STEVE RUSSELL / TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO)

 

The under-resourcing of the backlogged criminal justice system has become a courtroom battle cry in Ontario, with some judges routinely calling on the government to loosen the purse strings so more of them can be hired.

 

Superior Court Justice John McMahon was the latest to issue a warning that a multimillion-dollar alleged financial fraud case might get tossed due to delay because there isn’t a Toronto-area judge available to preside over the trial before next January.

 

The hope is that more judges will ensure people accused of crimes receive their constitutional right to a timely trial. That, in theory, will lessen the risk of potentially serious cases collapsing, denying victims justice and defendants the right to clear their names.

 

That concern was heightened after the Supreme Court of Canada, in a 2016 case known as Jordan, imposed new limits on the amount of acceptable pretrial delay. In response, senior levels of governments have appointed more judges to, the province has said, “help speed up the justice system.”

 

Yet not everyone agrees that increasing judicial numbers will solve what is a very complex problem.

 

“They always say more judges, yeah, if there’s more judges, there’s going to be more cases, if there’s more police, there’s going to be more charges. More is not the right word in trying to increase the efficiencies. I just find it very myopic,” said Osgoode Hall law professor Alan Young.

 

Judges are expensive. As of last April, Ontario Superior Court judges earn $315,300 annually, in addition to generous benefits and a pension equivalent to two-thirds of their salaries. Provincially appointed judges receive $292,829 yearly, along with benefits and pensions based on years of service and age.

 

Rather than boosting judicial ranks, Young would like to see the expansion of alternative measures, with more disputes being resolved through negotiations and mediation, and the decriminalizing of minor offences to free up court resources.

 

“We try to use criminal justice for every social evil and as a result we can’t have an effective system,” he said.

 

Toronto defence lawyer Gary Grill agrees that a streamlined justice system, especially when crime rates are at historic lows, makes more sense than throwing additional judges at the problem, which “is a short-term solution at best.”

 

“We are likely overlooking the real problem: over prosecution, over charging, and an institutionalized fear of letting any prosecution go because we have become so risk adverse,” Grill wrote in email.

 

“A cost-benefit analysis must be employed. Crowns should have enhanced discretion to resolve charges. Marginal charges should not be prosecuted. Yet our courts continue to be clogged with marijuana prosecutions, weak cases where the Crown lacks the discretion to withdraw.”

 

Toronto defence lawyer Greg Lafontaine agrees “too much stuff” goes through the system that should be resolved with a plea arrangement but can’t because the prosecution won’t come to “reasonable terms” with the defence.

 

“Nobody is willing to use the discretion that they have to nip cases in the bud,” he said.

 

Laurie Gonet, president of the Ontario Crown Attorneys Association, said she’s disappointed by that suggestion, “because the numbers just don’t bear that out, we’re resolving stuff left, right and centre.”

 

At least 90 per cent of criminal charges in the Ontario Court of Justice are resolved, whether by way of plea or the withdrawing of charges, leaving 10 per cent which tend to be the most serious cases, she said.

 

Still, prosecutors must still prepare every file as if it is going to trial and “we’re being crushed under the workload of trying to do that. There simply aren’t enough of us ... to make it go faster.”

 

Cases are also much more labour intensive than they used to be due to a number of factors including the way criminal offences are investigated and the volume and nature of disclosure.

 

While it would be great if new provincial Crowns were hired, “why can’t we have more civilian staff ... to help us with the administrative things, so it frees us up to actually do the pretrials that will hopefully resolve things,” Gonet said.

 

Michael Spratt, who practises criminal law in Ottawa, says there are delays there of between 12 to 18 months for even simple trials, and longer delays for complex trials. Still, he thinks the delay problem has been exaggerated in some circles.

 

Digital evidence and investigative techniques have contributed to lengthier, more complicated trials, so while there might be room to appoint more judges “that’s not necessarily a good thing.”

 

“It’s easy to think the solution is just hiring more people, throwing more money at the problem, when I think the criminal justice system is really a pit that will swallow all of that up and offer diminishing returns,” he said.

 

If the federal government wants a leaner justice system it should follow through on some of its election promises, such as repealing some mandatory minimum sentences. “They contribute to court delays by incentivizing people to not resolve matters and go to trial.”

 

Federal NDP health critic Don Davies, who helped draft the party’s new decriminalization policy, said ending the unwinnable war on drugs would go a long way to solving the glut of cases clogging up the courts.

 

“Maybe we don’t have enough judges as long as we’re pursuing a criminalized approach to drug use because we keep feeding an interminable, endless supply of sick people into the justice system,” said Davies, who is a lawyer and MP for Vancouver Kingsway.

 

“One of the many happy benefits of a decriminalized approach, when you take the crime out of drug use and drug addiction, is you take those people out of the court system and that frees it up for issues that are properly in our justice system.”

 

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2018/03/09/why-hiring-more-judges-wont-necessarily-speed-up-the-justice-system.html