News details

Connection







Lost password?

Latest news

Another victory for state lawyers in the Court of Appeal
Another victory for state lawyers in the Court of Appeal

The union of lawyers and notaries of the State has just won another victory, while the Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the Superior Court which had invalidated the special law forcing their return to work, at the end of a long strike in 2017. Les avocats et notaires de l'État québécois (LANEQ) had walked out for four months, in 2016 and 2017, as part of a difficult negotiation to renew their collective agreement with the Quebec government.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2021-04-08
COVID-compliant courts aim to clear backlog of jury trials

Canada’s wheels of justice have slowed down during the pandemic, as court cases and the legal system reckon with COVID-19 concerns. As Ross Lord reports, jury trials are trying to stage a comeback while adjusting to a new reality.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2021-04-04
Crown attorneys to challenge letters of reprimand over October walkout
Crown attorneys to challenge letters of reprimand over October walkout

Sixty-one Nova Scotia Crown attorneys who walked off the job in October to protest legislation revoking their right to binding arbitration are challenging the discipline against them. Each Crown received a letter in April from Laura Lee Langley, Nova Scotia's public service commissioner, that will go into each of their personnel folders. The Crowns are seeking a judicial review of the discipline.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-07-09
Ottawa to allow federal bureaucrats to work from home if possible to prevent coronavirus spread
Ottawa to allow federal bureaucrats to work from home if possible to prevent coronavirus spread

The roughly 300,000 federal employees will be told to stay away from their offices throughout the country as long as their job allows it.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-03-13
Prosecutors Insulted by Government Salary Offer
Prosecutors Insulted by Government Salary Offer

Quebec crown prosecutors find the rejection of an independent report on their remuneration incomprehensible…

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-02-20
Supreme Court decision could help former N.S. Crown lawyer sue Premier, ex-justice minister for libe
Supreme Court decision could help former N.S. Crown lawyer sue Premier, ex-justice minister for libe

A Supreme Court of Canada decision could affect whether government lawyers can use confidential documents to defend their reputations if political bosses “throw them under the bus,” a law professor says.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-02-19


<-- Back to archived news

The SQ on the side of lawyers

01-03-2017

According to Mr Luc Bruno, it is only a matter of time before the Crown attorneys mimic the SQ polic and go to court to get arbitration instead of just recommendations. -PHOTO LIBRARY OF THE SUN


These union demands will multiply because of the jurisprudence created by the Supreme Court. To fully understand what is happening, especially in the case of lawyers, we must go back 20 years to a decision on the status of judges.

 

Step One: In 1997, the Supreme Court ruled that it was inappropriate for judges to negotiate their salary directly with the state. As a result, independent committees have been given the responsibility of making decisions on their salaries and making recommendations. The government is not obliged to follow them, but it must justify its decision.

 

Step Two: Starting in the early 2000s, Crown Attorneys across the country argue that the nature of their work requires the same independence status and arbitration mechanism as judges. The Ontario government gives in first. In 2003, the Quebec government is still resisting. Instead of arbitration, it gives its Crown attorneys and lawyers the right to strike, even if they do not want it.

 

Third step: In 2011, Quebec Crown attorneys go on strike and boycott the Permanent Anti-Corruption Unit (UPAC). The pressures are enormous on the government. A special law puts an end to the strike, but the prosecutors obtain that their wage conditions are subject to a non-binding arbitration mechanism, as for the judges.

 

Step Four: Also on strike in 2011, lawyers have the same demand as prosecutors. But they settle with the government two months earlier than their colleagues in return for a letter of understanding to discuss their bargaining system. This discussion is not done.

 

Fifth step: In October 2016, the lawyers again strike and claim the same status as prosecutors, with one difference: they want binding arbitration, that is to say enforceable. Why this requirement? Because of a Supreme Court ruling in 2015 that invalidates a Saskatchewan essential services law. This ruling states that the law "substantially impedes the right to a genuine process of collective bargaining". The Court states that the right to strike "enjoys constitutional protection because of its crucial function". Two judges dissenting: Richard Wagner and Marshall Tothstein. They argue that the Court should not interfere in the delicate balance of labor relations established by elected officials.

 

This judgment is major. Deprived of the right to strike, as are the SQ police officers, or recalled by a special law such as jurists, the case is the same: the unions argue that their constitutional rights are being violated. 

 

This, in their view, is the same kind of impediment to "a genuine process of collective bargaining" denounced by the Supreme Court in the case of Saskatchewan. This will be the basis of the legal battle that the state's lawyers now plan to take against the Quebec government.

 

Crown attorneys will follow

 

It's only a matter of time before Crown Attorneys imitate SQ police and go to court to get binding arbitration instead of simple recommendations, predicts lawyer Negotiator Luc Bruno . "Clearly, the path is drawn. They could easily, like the SQ police and other organizations such as peace officers, appeal to the Superior Court to invoke the unconstitutionality of their regime. "
Even the judges could theoretically bring such an appeal, according to Mr. Bruno, but he doubted that because the government finally respected the latest recommendations of the committee to advise him on their salary.

 

The legal negotiator also believes that a repeat of the nurses' strike, brought back to work by a special law under Lucien Bouchard, would take a different turn because of the Saskatchewan decision. "This is a case in point," he explains, "and the principle adopted by the Court is the balance in the negotiations. The government is an employer, and labor relations regimes must be built in such a way that there is a balance of power in the negotiations. It is from this perspective that the Court said in 2015 that even if you are a government, you can not get out the baton or the atomic bomb to end a negotiation. " 

 

Mr. Bruno indicated that the Saskatchewan decision may also apply to the private sector if there is government intervention. In recent examples, he cites Acts 71 and 111, passed in 2015 and 2016 to end the conflicts between garage employees in the Saguenay and the Relais Nordik shipping company. He pointed out that in both cases, the special law provided for an arbitration mechanism in case of failure of mediation, which the government refused to its lawyers.

 

Mr. Bruno's remarks are echoed by the Canadian Association of Jurists, chaired by Halifax lawyer Rick Woodburn. "In Quebec, the government tells its lawyers that they can not be entitled to binding arbitration and it removes the right to strike. In our opinion, this is unconstitutional. "

 

Mr. Woodburn points out that the only exception allowed to the rule of law would be in the case of a government that faces "extreme budgetary constraints. But it can not last forever. And what we did in Quebec, in my opinion, is simply punitive. "

 

Finally, counsel states that Ontario, Nova Scotia and Manitoba have granted binding arbitration to their lawyers. In British Columbia, lawyers have a right to binding arbitration only for normative clauses. The government gives them 75% of the salary paid to provincial judges. According to him, the litigation of the Quebec jurists is on a direct way towards the Supreme Court.

 

http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/actualites/chroniques/gilbert-lavoie/201703/01/01-5074678-la-sq-du-cote-des-juristes.php