News details


Lost password?

Latest news

Another victory for state lawyers in the Court of Appeal
Another victory for state lawyers in the Court of Appeal

The union of lawyers and notaries of the State has just won another victory, while the Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the Superior Court which had invalidated the special law forcing their return to work, at the end of a long strike in 2017. Les avocats et notaires de l'État québécois (LANEQ) had walked out for four months, in 2016 and 2017, as part of a difficult negotiation to renew their collective agreement with the Quebec government.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2021-04-08
COVID-compliant courts aim to clear backlog of jury trials

Canada’s wheels of justice have slowed down during the pandemic, as court cases and the legal system reckon with COVID-19 concerns. As Ross Lord reports, jury trials are trying to stage a comeback while adjusting to a new reality.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2021-04-04
Crown attorneys to challenge letters of reprimand over October walkout
Crown attorneys to challenge letters of reprimand over October walkout

Sixty-one Nova Scotia Crown attorneys who walked off the job in October to protest legislation revoking their right to binding arbitration are challenging the discipline against them. Each Crown received a letter in April from Laura Lee Langley, Nova Scotia's public service commissioner, that will go into each of their personnel folders. The Crowns are seeking a judicial review of the discipline.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-07-09
Ottawa to allow federal bureaucrats to work from home if possible to prevent coronavirus spread
Ottawa to allow federal bureaucrats to work from home if possible to prevent coronavirus spread

The roughly 300,000 federal employees will be told to stay away from their offices throughout the country as long as their job allows it.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-03-13
Prosecutors Insulted by Government Salary Offer
Prosecutors Insulted by Government Salary Offer

Quebec crown prosecutors find the rejection of an independent report on their remuneration incomprehensible…

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-02-20
Supreme Court decision could help former N.S. Crown lawyer sue Premier, ex-justice minister for libe
Supreme Court decision could help former N.S. Crown lawyer sue Premier, ex-justice minister for libe

A Supreme Court of Canada decision could affect whether government lawyers can use confidential documents to defend their reputations if political bosses “throw them under the bus,” a law professor says.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2020-02-19

<-- Back to archived news

Legal experts lambaste province for ‘arbitrary ’ Crown attorneys bill


Martin Herschorn, the director of public prosecutions for the Public Prosecution Service, speaks at the legislature's law amendments committee as Crown attorneys sit in the background. (Michael Gorman/CBC)

Leading experts in labour law, constitutional law and even the director of the province's Public Prosecution Service excoriated the Nova Scotia government on Friday for its plan to strip Crown attorneys of their right to binding arbitration and declare them an essential service.


The government tabled Bill 203 earlier this week after failing the reach a contract agreement with the Crowns. The government has offered them a seven per cent wage increase over four years, while the Crowns want 17 per cent over four years.


The bill revokes the Crowns' right to binding arbitration, a right they agreed to extend in their last agreement in exchange for a smaller wage increase, and replaces it with the right to strike while also requiring Crowns be deemed an essential service.


In a legislature where it's become common practice in recent years to see people appearing before the law amendments committee to voice opposition to labour-related bills, it was the resumes and experience of witnesses on Friday that stood out.


"In all of my years of practice, I have never seen such arbitrary action done by a government, particularly in respect of the people who are on the front lines of the criminal courts and play a pivotal role in the administration of justice," said Paul Cavalluzzo, a labour and constitutional lawyer with more than 40 years experience who was speaking on behalf of the Nova Scotia Crown Attorneys' Association.


Paul Cavalluzzo, a labour and constitutional lawyer with more than 40 years experience, predicted at the law amendments committee that Bill 203 would not withstand a court challenge. (Craig Paisley/CBC)

Cavalluzzo noted that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires the government to introduce legislation that charter compliant. He pulled no punches in his assessment of a bill he predicted would eventually be struck down in what would be a costly, protracted court challenge.


"I can't believe that any lawyer in this country that can spell the word 'charter' would find this law to be constitutional," he said.


Cavalluzzo said the bill is unconstitutional for a number of reasons, including that it came amidst contract negotiations and it came without notice to the other party. He said the proposed right to strike is an "illusion" and it rips up a previous agreement the government signed with the Crowns.


"Most Canadians believe that a deal is a deal," Cavalluzzo told the committee. "What is the point of making an agreement with the government that's not going to keep its word?"


Cavalluzzo said the government's view of collective bargaining "is that it's my way or the highway."


'This is disrespectful to my office'


Martin Herschorn, the province's director of public prosecutions, said Bill 203 would be "a disaster" for the criminal justice system and threatens the viability and sustainability of the province's Public Prosecution Service.


Herschorn said it is offensive that the government would violate a framework agreement it signed just a few years ago and he took personal issue with only learning of the plan around the time it was being tabled in Province House.


"I had no opportunity to voice my opinion, one that would have been based on 48 years of experience in the operation of a prosecution service," he told politicians. "This is disrespectful of my office."


For the government to suggest it is giving the Crowns the right to strike is "misleading and disingenuous," said Herschorn, because everything Crowns do is an essential service.


"They are what stands between the people of this province and murderers, child molesters and thieves," he said.


"Saying Crown attorneys have the right to strike is meaningless. A strike would bring mayhem to the courts. Public safety would be jeopardized. There's not one Crown attorney that wouldn't be considered essential."


'No political axe to grind'


Speaking to reporters following his testimony, Herschorn said he has the independence and responsibility to speak out and is not concerned about possible reprisal from the government.


"I am not a politician. I have no political axe to grind. I don't want to be interpreted as taking a political stance one way or the other," said Herschorn.


"I'm here to support the continued viability of a very important institution in the administration of criminal justice in Nova Scotia."


Premier Stephen McNeil has said throughout the week and again on Friday that the bill is necessary to preserve the government's finances now and into the future. Through successful contracts, the government has established a wage pattern it believes is fair to workers while also taking into consideration the government's ability to pay.


As he has in the past, McNeil said he would not allow an "unelected, unaccountable third-party arbitrator" determine what the government can or cannot pay.


He said he's concerned a finding in favour of the Crowns would set a pattern that would cascade across the public service and cost hundreds of millions of dollars.


100 people can't set a pattern


But noted Halifax-based labour lawyer Raymond Larkin told the law amendments committee the premier's fear is mistaken and "inconceivable."


"No one would accept that 100 people should establish whatever the rates of pay are for 75,000 people," he told the committee, referring to the total size of the province's public service.


Further, the Crowns' salaries are set with an eye to comparability with colleagues in other provinces, said Larkin, and so has no bearing on other public sector workers.


Following witness presentations, Liberal MLAs on the committee used their majority to defeat an opposition motion that would have sent the bill back to the department to consider witness submissions and require a written opinion from the Justice Department on the constitutionality of the bill be presented to the committee.


The Liberals then used their majority to refer the legislation back to the House, where it could appear before the committee of the whole as early as Tuesday.


In response to a request from CBC News for a written legal opinion that Bill 203 is constitutional, a government spokesperson said in an email: "We are confident in the legislation and believe it is the best way forward."