News details


Lost password?

Latest news

Court rules Quebec’s back-to-work legislation unconstitutional
Court rules Quebec’s back-to-work legislation unconstitutional

A Quebec court ruling that declared unconstitutional a special law that forced provincial government lawyers and notaries to put a halt to the longest Canadian strike by public civil servants may give them much needed ammunition to persuade the government to introduce binding arbitration, according to legal experts.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2019-10-02
Global News Investigates: Almost half of Edmonton criminal cases ultimately withdrawn

Nearly 50 per cent of cases where Edmonton police lay charges are ultimately withdrawn by Crown prosecutors.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2019-09-30
Preliminary hearings dropped in effort to speed up courts; lawyers say it will have opposite effect
Preliminary hearings dropped in effort to speed up courts; lawyers say it will have opposite effect

As of Thursday, only those facing a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison or longer will be eligible for a preliminary inquiry, a legal proceeding in which a judge determines whether there is enough evidence to send a case to trial. Under the new federal legislation, preliminary hearings will not be held for many serious charges, such as sexual assault, assault with a weapon, major theft and most firearms offences.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2019-09-19
Alberta courts face uncertainty as justice bill scales back preliminary inquiries
Alberta courts face uncertainty as justice bill scales back preliminary inquiries

Fewer people facing criminal charges will be eligible for preliminary inquiries prior to trial when a controversial portion of the Liberal justice bill goes into effect this month.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2019-09-16
Red Deer’s court system under stress from many sides
Red Deer’s court system under stress from many sides

Shortage of Crown prosecutors not only challenge in courts, says former prosecutor.

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2019-07-26
Hundreds of Calgarians charged with crimes walk free due to lack of prosecutors
Hundreds of Calgarians charged with crimes walk free due to lack of prosecutors

Average of 5-15 low complexity trials dumped every week

[ ...More ]
Publication date : 2019-07-22

<-- Back to archived news

Labour union blasts CAQ government during Bill 21 hearings


A group of protesters, including lawyers and teachers, against Bill 21 formed a human chain in downtown Montreal, Quebec May 5, 2019. CHRISTINNE MUSCHI / MONTREAL GAZETTE


QUEBEC — One of the province’s largest labour unions did an about face Wednesday, saying Bill 21 condones prejudices and could lead to the ghettoization of Muslim women because they will not be allowed to work in certain government jobs.


In a stinging rebuke to the government on the second-to-last day of hearings into the proposed legislation, the Confédération des syndicats nationaux (CSN), which represents 300,000 workers including hundreds in the public sector, backtracked on its traditional position in favour of a ban on symbols for persons in authority.


The union now thinks a ban is a bad idea and will do nothing to make the government more secular.


In fact, the union testified, the government is playing a dangerous game that is already backfiring on the streets and on buses in the form of increased anti-immigrant behaviour and incidents.


“In worrying about religious symbols as does the bill, we are condoning prejudices against people who wear symbols and sowing doubt on their capacity (to work) in a professional manner, with neutrality, with integrity and ethics and not proselytizing,” CSN counsellor Marie-Hélène Bonin told the committee.


“One of the dangers we see is the ghettoization of certain communities or certain women who are sent back home,” added her union colleague Mireille Bénard. “Women who we see integrate and emancipate themselves might have to stay at home. What is really worrisome is the ghettoization of certain communities.”


“I hope the minister (Simon Jolin-Barrette) has been attentive to what you are saying,” responded the Québec solidaire MNA on the committee, Sol Zanetti, who sparked the comments with his blunt questions to the union.


It is shift for the union which, in the 2013 debate on the Parti Québécois’s defunct Charter of Quebec Values, took a stand in favour of the Bouchard-Taylor formula that would have slapped a ban on persons in authority such as judges, police officers and prison guards.


At the time, the CSN also argued in favour of expanding the ban to daycare workers and teachers.


But union president Jacques Létourneau told the committee times are changing and the new younger union membership does not see things the same way as the old generation. Immigrants and symbols are in their daily lives.


He also told the committee the bill unfairly targets Muslim women creating “a phenomena of discrimination” against them, while a Muslim man who has a beard for reasons of faith is not targeted because it is simply seen as a “hipster” symbol.


But the union warned of the long-term consequences of Bill 21.


In one paragraph of its brief, the union says “Introducing additional measures that discriminate against entry to the workplace will have the effect of creating a social fracture and resentment in thus marginalized communities for decades to come.”


The testimony comes as the committee winds down from two weeks of hearings. Thursday is the last day.


And while the association representing the province’s provincial police officers endorsed the bill the same as Montreal’s police fraternity has, lawyers and notaries working for the government poked holes in the bill.


They told the committee examining Bill 21 that the rules against religious symbols have to cover all of them or none. It’s a question of coherence.


Describing the issue of symbols as “marginal” among the hundreds of lawyers in the employ of the Quebec government, Marc Dion, president of Les avocats et notaires de l’État Québécois, said of his 1,267 members, between 600 and 700 are covered by the ban in the bill, 500 are not.


That means applying the bill presents special challenges for the judiciary, he added.


There could be situations in a courtroom where a lawyer working for the Régie du logement or the Quebec Human Rights Commission would not be allowed to wear a symbol, but a lawyer working for Revenue Quebec, l’Autorité des marchés financiers or Investissement Québec on the same case can.


And what happens when lawyers are called in to help a cabinet minister at a legislature committee? The lawyer from the finance department is barred from wearing a symbol, the one from revenue is not?


“We are all lawyers, there are just different fields of expertise,” Dion told the committee. “For us, it’s all or none. It’s a question of coherence.


Dion said in his view when a lawyer represents the state they have to be “impartial and neutral,” and appearances matter.


“What happens when someone who finds themselves refused an immigration certificate and sees that the lawyer who is representing the state … is of another faith?  Objectively, certain people might say ‘he was against me because he does not have the same faith.’ ”


The committee also heard Wednesday from the Mouvement laïque Québécois, a civilian lobby group pushing for secularism. The group asked for the ban to be expanded.